Disability at the Heart of Theology: On Marginality, Method, and Overcoming “Best-Case Anthropologies”

Disability in the Christian Tradition breaks new ground by fruitfully exploring the Christian tradition's positive contributions to theological understandings of disability. However, examination of how contemporary authors retrieve traditional insights shows two divergent methods: Some authors...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Antus, Elizabeth Lawrence (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge 2013
Dans: Journal of religion, disability & health
Année: 2013, Volume: 17, Numéro: 3, Pages: 244-262
Sujets non-standardisés:B Disability
B John Swinton
B Brian Brock
B Theological Anthropology
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1762905272
003 DE-627
005 20210714165651.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210714s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/15228967.2013.809879  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1762905272 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1762905272 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1173219625  |0 (DE-627)1042363455  |0 (DE-576)515102598  |4 aut  |a Antus, Elizabeth Lawrence 
109 |a Antus, Elizabeth Lawrence  |a Antus, Elizabeth L.  |a Antus, Elizabeth 
245 1 0 |a Disability at the Heart of Theology  |b On Marginality, Method, and Overcoming “Best-Case Anthropologies” 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Disability in the Christian Tradition breaks new ground by fruitfully exploring the Christian tradition's positive contributions to theological understandings of disability. However, examination of how contemporary authors retrieve traditional insights shows two divergent methods: Some authors prefer to enfold disabled people into a pre-existent anthropology that still presupposes an “ideal” functioning of body and mind, while others explicitly rethink anthropological categories from looking first at the lives of such people and then foregrounding limitation and vulnerability. The following article both demonstrates why the latter option may ultimately provide more traction while suggesting ways to improve it. 
601 |a Theologe 
601 |a Anthropologie 
650 4 |a Brian Brock 
650 4 |a John Swinton 
650 4 |a Disability 
650 4 |a Theological Anthropology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religion, disability & health  |d [S.l.] : Routledge, 1999  |g 17(2013), 3, Seite 244-262  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)366026801  |w (DE-600)2112749-9  |w (DE-576)105935026  |x 1522-9122  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2013  |g number:3  |g pages:244-262 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/15228967.2013.809879  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 17  |j 2013  |e 3  |h 244-262 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3951180099 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1762905272 
LOK |0 005 20210714165651 
LOK |0 008 210714||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL