Disability at the Heart of Theology: On Marginality, Method, and Overcoming “Best-Case Anthropologies”
Disability in the Christian Tradition breaks new ground by fruitfully exploring the Christian tradition's positive contributions to theological understandings of disability. However, examination of how contemporary authors retrieve traditional insights shows two divergent methods: Some authors...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Routledge
2013
|
Dans: |
Journal of religion, disability & health
Année: 2013, Volume: 17, Numéro: 3, Pages: 244-262 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Disability
B John Swinton B Brian Brock B Theological Anthropology |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1762905272 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210714165651.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210714s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/15228967.2013.809879 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1762905272 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1762905272 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1173219625 |0 (DE-627)1042363455 |0 (DE-576)515102598 |4 aut |a Antus, Elizabeth Lawrence | |
109 | |a Antus, Elizabeth Lawrence |a Antus, Elizabeth L. |a Antus, Elizabeth | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Disability at the Heart of Theology |b On Marginality, Method, and Overcoming “Best-Case Anthropologies” |
264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Disability in the Christian Tradition breaks new ground by fruitfully exploring the Christian tradition's positive contributions to theological understandings of disability. However, examination of how contemporary authors retrieve traditional insights shows two divergent methods: Some authors prefer to enfold disabled people into a pre-existent anthropology that still presupposes an “ideal” functioning of body and mind, while others explicitly rethink anthropological categories from looking first at the lives of such people and then foregrounding limitation and vulnerability. The following article both demonstrates why the latter option may ultimately provide more traction while suggesting ways to improve it. | ||
601 | |a Theologe | ||
601 | |a Anthropologie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Brian Brock | |
650 | 4 | |a John Swinton | |
650 | 4 | |a Disability | |
650 | 4 | |a Theological Anthropology | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religion, disability & health |d [S.l.] : Routledge, 1999 |g 17(2013), 3, Seite 244-262 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)366026801 |w (DE-600)2112749-9 |w (DE-576)105935026 |x 1522-9122 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2013 |g number:3 |g pages:244-262 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/15228967.2013.809879 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
936 | u | w | |d 17 |j 2013 |e 3 |h 244-262 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3951180099 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1762905272 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210714165651 | ||
LOK | |0 008 210714||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |