“To Be or Not To Be?”: Hamlet and Tyrannicide

Abstract This essay considers Shakespeare through Aristotelianism and Thomism to explore Hamlet as a meditation on tyranny. Based on the classical model of tragedy as presented by Aristotle in his Poetics and further informed by his Ethics and Politics , the essay identifies the climax of the play i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Coonradt, Nicole ca. 21. Jh. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Brill 2021
In: Religion and the arts
Jahr: 2021, Band: 25, Heft: 3, Seiten: 243-262
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Shakespeare, William 1564-1616, Hamlet / Tyrannenmord / Aristoteles 384 v. Chr.-322 v. Chr. / Politische Ethik / Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274
RelBib Classification:FA Theologie
KBF Britische Inseln
NCD Politische Ethik
weitere Schlagwörter:B Anger
B Ethics
B Climax
B Shakespeare
B Aquinas
B Tyrannicide
B tyrant
B Vengeance
B Tragedy
B Aristotle
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract This essay considers Shakespeare through Aristotelianism and Thomism to explore Hamlet as a meditation on tyranny. Based on the classical model of tragedy as presented by Aristotle in his Poetics and further informed by his Ethics and Politics , the essay identifies the climax of the play in order to determine the playwright’s argument about what should have happened instead of what did—namely, the hero should have removed the tyrant Claudius when given the opportunity at Act 3, Scene 3. Shakespeare is deliberately and successfully upending the Aristotelian model, while yet fulfilling its definitions and expectations. The claim is further supported by Aquinas’s six conditions for the right use of anger and vengeance as found in his Summa Theologica . Hamlet’s choice not to act is highly significant—and ironically Shakespearean. The play’s treatment of tyranny may have been a call to action for Shakespeare’s contemporary audience.
ISSN:1568-5292
Enthält:Enthalten in: Religion and the arts
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685292-02503001