God’s Devils: Pragmatic Theodicy in Christian Responses to Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn’s Conquest of Jerusalem in 1187

Abstract This paper considers Christian responses to the problem of evil following Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn’s conquest of Jerusalem. Among Catholics, Audita Tremendi offered the orthodox response that God was punishing Christian sin. However, the logical conclusion of this view is that the Muslims were agents o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Brewer, Keagan (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Brill 2021
In: Medieval encounters
Jahr: 2021, Band: 27, Heft: 2, Seiten: 125-164
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Saladin, Aijubidenreich, Sultan 1137-1193 / Eroberung von Jerusalem (1187) / Bewältigung / Christentum / Theodizee / Das Böse / Strafe
RelBib Classification:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
BJ Islam
CC Christentum und nichtchristliche Religionen; interreligiöse Beziehungen
KBL Naher Osten; Nordafrika
NBC Gotteslehre
weitere Schlagwörter:B Third Crusade
B Theodicy
B Jerusalem
B Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn (Saladin)
B Kingdom of Jerusalem
B 1187
B problem of evil
B Christianity
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract This paper considers Christian responses to the problem of evil following Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn’s conquest of Jerusalem. Among Catholics, Audita Tremendi offered the orthodox response that God was punishing Christian sin. However, the logical conclusion of this view is that the Muslims were agents of God despite being “evil” for having captured Jerusalem from Christians. Twelfth-century theologians believed that God could use demons in the service of good. In response to 1187, while many Christians portrayed the Muslims as evil, some expressed that they were divine agents. Meanwhile, others murmured that Muslim gods (including, to some, Muḥammad) were superior to Christian ones; that the Christian god was apathetic, violent, or wicked; that the crusade of 1189–92 was against God’s will; and that crusaders were murderers. Thought-terminating clichés centring on the divine mysteries permitted the continuance of Christianity in the face of this profound theodical controversy.
ISSN:1570-0674
Enthält:Enthalten in: Medieval encounters
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700674-12340098