Pitched between Scylla and Charybdis: Metz Jews’ Litigation Hurdles in the Metz Beit Din and Ancien Regime French Courts

Abstract During the eighteenth century, French courts expanded their competence over Jewish disputes in order to consolidate the kingdom’s hegemony over Alsatian Jewry. In Metz, the expansion was sanctioned by a royal order for the composition of the Recueil des Loix, Coutumes, et Usages Observes pa...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The review of rabbinic Judaism
Main Author: Herman, Shael (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2021
In: The review of rabbinic Judaism
Further subjects:B Alsatian Jewry
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1760096660
003 DE-627
005 20211001162935.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210609s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15700704-12341373  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1760096660 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1760096660 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)116174813X  |0 (DE-627)1025199251  |0 (DE-576)161393667  |4 aut  |a Herman, Shael 
109 |a Herman, Shael 
245 1 0 |a Pitched between Scylla and Charybdis: Metz Jews’ Litigation Hurdles in the Metz Beit Din and Ancien Regime French Courts 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract During the eighteenth century, French courts expanded their competence over Jewish disputes in order to consolidate the kingdom’s hegemony over Alsatian Jewry. In Metz, the expansion was sanctioned by a royal order for the composition of the Recueil des Loix, Coutumes, et Usages Observes par les Juifs de Metz (1742). A blend of Jewish law and French customary law tailored for ancien regime Alsatian courts, the Recueil enabled a Jewish claimant to sue in either the beit din or a French tribunal. These judicial alternatives posed strategic dilemmas. French rulings were frequently vehicles for persecuting Jewish claimants and debasing their law, while rabbinical enforcement mechanisms typically lacked the aggressive bite of their French judicial counterparts. This article examines how the law, and these options, worked in practice. 
650 4 |a Alsatian Jewry 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The review of rabbinic Judaism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2001  |g 24(2021), 1, Seite 1-45  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)363738568  |w (DE-600)2103430-8  |w (DE-576)273874322  |x 1570-0704  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2021  |g number:1  |g pages:1-45 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15700704-12341373  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/rrj/24/1/article-p1_1.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2021  |e 1  |h 1-45 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 393621445X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1760096660 
LOK |0 005 20210609042640 
LOK |0 008 210609||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-06-08#30B803CD16F4E583739A63FADB71F64F51CA54AC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL