Everything but the Squeal: The Politics of Porcinity in the Livre des Propriétés des Choses

Mediaeval encyclopaedias described nonhuman animals in terms of their corporeality and cosmic significance by combining zoological and theological knowledge. Such descriptions were therefore prescriptions of normative parameters for how animals were supposed to function within Christian society, rat...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gins, Sven (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI [2021]
In: Religions
Year: 2021, Volume: 12, Issue: 4
Further subjects:B Anthropocentrism
B critical animal studies
B (nonhuman) animals
B historical anthropology
B Religion
B human–animal studies
B history of Christian thought
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1756952353
003 DE-627
005 20210622134201.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210503s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel12040260  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1756952353 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1756952353 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gins, Sven  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Everything but the Squeal  |b The Politics of Porcinity in the Livre des Propriétés des Choses 
264 1 |c [2021] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Mediaeval encyclopaedias described nonhuman animals in terms of their corporeality and cosmic significance by combining zoological and theological knowledge. Such descriptions were therefore prescriptions of normative parameters for how animals were supposed to function within Christian society, rather than objective observations. As mediaeval conceptualisations of species were highly malleable, particular animals that shared no biological relation could be considered kin, and animals who behaved against their prescribed nature could become a different animal altogether. This paper investigates how several species were implicated in the mediaeval invention of what it meant to be (like) a pig. My counter-hegemonic reading of the Livre des propriétés des choses, a fifteenth-century French encyclopaedia, draws attention to how late mediaeval Christian scripts of porcinity simultaneously defined the nonhumanity of pigs and of ‘other’ humans. These render the idea of the pig inseparable from what it meant to be human. I contend that the Livre des propriétés des choses employs discourses of porcinity to self-define and -stabilise particular notions of human identity by debasing and othering human and nonhuman animals with seemingly porcine traits. Additionally, I underline how such fabrications of humanity are often mired in practices that devaluate and harm real animals, including other humans. Mediaeval studies need to further address the crucial roles of animal suffering in human history. This way, historians can add valuable insights to present debates about anthropocentrism and its devastating socio-ecological consequences. 
650 4 |a (nonhuman) animals 
650 4 |a Anthropocentrism 
650 4 |a critical animal studies 
650 4 |a historical anthropology 
650 4 |a history of Christian thought 
650 4 |a human–animal studies 
650 4 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 12(2021), 4, Artikel-ID 260  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g elocationid:260 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/4/260/pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12040260  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/4/260  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 12  |j 2021  |e 4  |i 260 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3921424429 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1756952353 
LOK |0 005 20210503110144 
LOK |0 008 210503||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion 
STB 0 0 |a Religion,Religions,Religion 
STC 0 0 |a Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Religione,Religione,Religione 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教 
STG 0 0 |a Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Религия,Религия (мотив) 
STI 0 0 |a Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο) 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie