Revisiting Joseph Campbell’s The Power of Myth

This paper considers the relevance of The Power of Myth to the secular study of religion. First, I identify the scholars from whom Campbell borrows concepts. I organize these scholars into three groups – the qualitative religious scholars, the quantitative religious scholars, and those who draw from...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gorman, Daniel, Jr. 1991- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: UtahState University, Merrill-Cazier Library 2014
In: Intermountain West journal of religious studies
Year: 2014, Volume: 5, Issue: 1, Pages: 72-88
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1753554594
003 DE-627
005 20220120081315.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210409s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1753554594 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1753554594 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1249930049  |0 (DE-627)1786554631  |4 aut  |a Gorman, Daniel  |c Jr.  |d 1991- 
109 |a Gorman, Daniel Jr. 1991-  |a Gorman, Daniel 1991- 
245 1 0 |a Revisiting Joseph Campbell’s The Power of Myth 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper considers the relevance of The Power of Myth to the secular study of religion. First, I identify the scholars from whom Campbell borrows concepts. I organize these scholars into three groups – the qualitative religious scholars, the quantitative religious scholars, and those who draw from both approaches. Next, I identify Joseph Campbell’s key ideas (the monomyth, the hero’s journey, the existence of a higher power or energy, the lack of myth in the modern world, and the notion that religion possesses given qualities). I then analyze the contradictions inherent within Campbell’s argument, for Campbell fails to synthesize three scholarly traditions into one coherent theory of religion. Additionally, I discuss Campbell’s descriptive reductionism, his reactionary views regarding secularization, and the political conservatism found within the book. I conclude that Power is not an authoritative work of secular religious scholarship, but rather one man’s subjective blend of research and personal beliefs. 
601 |a Campbell, Joseph 
601 |a Campbell, W. E. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Intermountain West journal of religious studies  |d Logan, UT : UtahState University, Merrill-Cazier Library, 2009  |g 5(2014), 1, Seite 72-88  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)869892649  |w (DE-600)2870684-5  |w (DE-576)477879373  |x 2155-1723  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2014  |g number:1  |g pages:72-88 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1839519274  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/imwjournal/vol5/iss1/5/  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 5  |j 2014  |e 1  |h 72-88 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4056116032 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1753554594 
LOK |0 005 20220211155948 
LOK |0 008 220211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL