Insult and Post-sovereign Law as Juridicity
This paper attempts to define a post-sovereign conception of law. It is based on the Austinian theory of the performative, and on the discussions of this theory by Derrida and Butler, but also on the debates resulting from the attacks on Charlie Hebdo in Paris in 2015.
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
2021
|
| Dans: |
Political theology
Année: 2021, Volume: 22, Numéro: 2, Pages: 147-154 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Performativité (Sciences culturelles)
/ Droit
/ Injure
|
| RelBib Classification: | XA Droit |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Deconstruction
B Law B Injury B Political Philosophy B Performative B Hate Speech B Freedom of speech |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This paper attempts to define a post-sovereign conception of law. It is based on the Austinian theory of the performative, and on the discussions of this theory by Derrida and Butler, but also on the debates resulting from the attacks on Charlie Hebdo in Paris in 2015. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1743-1719 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Political theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2021.1885828 |