Is It Rational to Reject Expert Consensus?
Abstract Philosophers defend, and often believe, controversial philosophical claims. Since they aren’t clueless, they are usually aware that their views are controversial—on some occasions, the views are definitely in the minority amongst the relevant specialist-experts. In addition, most philosophe...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
2020
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Jahr: 2020, Band: 10, Heft: 3/4, Seiten: 325-345 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Philosoph
/ Philosophischer Glaube
/ Experte
/ Ablehnung
/ Irrationalität
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
epistemology of philosophy
B Disagreement B Skepticism B Controversy B Metaphilosophy B Expertise |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 174770637X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230525160128.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210206s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-BJA10015 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)174770637X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP174770637X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1037860241 |0 (DE-627)756364221 |0 (DE-576)391900706 |4 aut |a Frances, Bryan | |
| 109 | |a Frances, Bryan |a Frances, Bryan R. S. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is It Rational to Reject Expert Consensus? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Philosophers defend, and often believe, controversial philosophical claims. Since they aren’t clueless, they are usually aware that their views are controversial—on some occasions, the views are definitely in the minority amongst the relevant specialist-experts. In addition, most philosophers are aware that they are not God’s gift to philosophy, since they admit their ability to track truth in philosophy is not extraordinary compared to that of other philosophers. In this paper I argue that in many real-life cases, such beliefs in controversial claims are irrational. This means that most philosophers have irrational philosophical beliefs. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaphilosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a epistemology of philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Skepticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Expertise | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Controversy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Disagreement | |
| 652 | |a AB:VA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4045790-4 |0 (DE-627)106200267 |0 (DE-576)209066865 |2 gnd |a Philosoph |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4197012-3 |0 (DE-627)105199583 |0 (DE-576)210111968 |2 gnd |a Philosophischer Glaube |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4071081-6 |0 (DE-627)104123281 |0 (DE-576)209182784 |2 gnd |a Experte |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4207950-0 |0 (DE-627)10511622X |0 (DE-576)210183314 |2 gnd |a Ablehnung |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4162427-0 |0 (DE-627)105462403 |0 (DE-576)209873310 |2 gnd |a Irrationalität |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 10(2020), 3/4, Seite 325-345 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2020 |g number:3/4 |g pages:325-345 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-BJA10015 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/10/3-4/article-p325_325.xml |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 10 |j 2020 |e 3/4 |h 325-345 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3849599663 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 174770637X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211123153630 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-02-05#DD31ADEE7749D7F83A17469EC110E5EA009DE18E | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Expert,Expertise,Irrationality,The Irrational,Philosopher,Philosopher,Thinker,Philosophers in art,Philosophical faith,Rejection of,Refusal of,Dismissal and nonsuit |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Expert,Expertise,Foi philosophique,Irrationalité,Philosophe,Philosophe,Rejet,Révocation,Révocation,Révocation (droit civil) |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Especialista,Fe filosófica,Filósofo,Filósofo,Irracionalidad,Obras de arte,Rechazo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Esperto,Expertise,Competenza,Competenza,Fede filosofica,Filosofo,Filosofo,Irrazionalità,Rifiuto |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 哲学信仰,哲学家,哲学家,拒絶,非理性,不合理 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 哲學信仰,哲學家,哲學家,拒絶,非理性,不合理 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Especialista,Filósofo,Filósofo,Fé filosófica,Irracionalidade,Rejeição |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Иррациональность,Отказ,Философ (мотив),Философ,Философская вера,Эксперт,Экспертиза |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Απόρριψη,Εμπειρογνώμονας,Ειδικός,Παραλογισμός,Πραγματογνωμοσύνη,Φιλοσοφική πίστη,Φιλόσοφος (μοτίβο),Φιλόσοφος |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Denker,Philosophen , Fachmann |