Promoting the Everyday: Pro-Sharia Advocacy and Public Relations in Ontario, Canada’s “Sharia Debate”
Why, in the midst of public debates related to religion, are unrepresentative orthodox perspectives often positioned as illustrative of a religious tradition? How can more representative voices be encouraged? Political theorist Anne Phillips (2007) suggests that facilitating multi-voiced individual...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
MDPI
[2013]
|
Dans: |
Religions
Année: 2013, Volume: 4, Numéro: 3, Pages: 423-442 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Muslims
B Canada B Advocacy B Public relations B faith-based arbitration B Representation B Ontario B Orthodoxy B “Sharia Debate” |
Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | Why, in the midst of public debates related to religion, are unrepresentative orthodox perspectives often positioned as illustrative of a religious tradition? How can more representative voices be encouraged? Political theorist Anne Phillips (2007) suggests that facilitating multi-voiced individual engagements effectively dismantles the monopolies of the most conservative that tend to privilege maleness. In this paper, with reference to the 2003-2005 faith-based arbitration debate in Ontario, Canada, I show how, in practice, Phillips’ approach is unwieldy and does not work well in a sound-bite-necessitating culture. Instead, I argue that the “Sharia Debate” served as a catalyst for mainstream conservative Muslim groups in Ontario to develop public relations apparatuses that better facilitate the perspectives of everyday religious conservatives in the public sphere. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel4030423 |