Rethinking the relationship between the study of religions, theology and religious concerns: a response to some aspects of Wiebe's and Martin's paper

This response deals with some aspects of Luther Martin and Donald Wiebe's paper "Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion". The authors think that the human mind in general constantly tends towards religiousness and thus comprehensive scientific inqu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bubík, Tomáš 1967- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Společnost [2012]
In: Religio
Year: 2012, Volume: 20, Issue: 1, Pages: [43]-53
Further subjects:B Theology
B Central and Eastern Europe
B study of religions
B politics of education
B Inter-religious Dialogue
B ideology of humanities
B religious concerns
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1743816588
003 DE-627
005 20220630101407.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210104s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 11222.digilib/125396  |2 hdl 
035 |a (DE-627)1743816588 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1743816588 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1075260779  |0 (DE-627)833116304  |0 (DE-576)443350949  |4 aut  |a Bubík, Tomáš  |d 1967- 
109 |a Bubík, Tomáš 1967- 
245 1 0 |a Rethinking the relationship between the study of religions, theology and religious concerns  |b a response to some aspects of Wiebe's and Martin's paper 
264 1 |c [2012] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This response deals with some aspects of Luther Martin and Donald Wiebe's paper "Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion". The authors think that the human mind in general constantly tends towards religiousness and thus comprehensive scientific inquiry into religion is actually impossible. They argue that "such study is not ever likely to occur in that or any other setting" (p. 9). They also stress that they were deluded in the past and argue that especially (or only) the cognitive approach can help us to elucidate the proclivity towards religiousness. I partly agree with them, particularly that the promotion of "extra-scientific" agendas in Academia is questionable, but I do not see it as such a serious problem. The reduction of the biases to only "religious" agendas is mistaken. The history of the field is a history of diverse "extra-scientific" agendas which change in accordance with social development and prevailing political interests. I present the situation from a central and eastern European point of view. At the same time, I argue that many scientific fields deal with the same issue, even if not to such an extent. This is because religious studies, more than other disciplines, attracts scholars with a special inclination toward religion. I also argue that scholarly results are much more important than "personal" agendas. Also, the aspiration of religious studies as presented by Martin and Wiebe seems to me too idealistic, perhaps utopist and thus unrealizable. 
601 |a Religion 
601 |a Religion & theology 
601 |a Theologe 
650 4 |a Central and Eastern Europe 
650 4 |a ideology of humanities 
650 4 |a Inter-religious Dialogue 
650 4 |a politics of education 
650 4 |a religious concerns 
650 4 |a study of religions 
650 4 |a Theology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religio  |d Brno : Společnost, 1993  |g 20(2012), 1, Seite [43]-53  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)728517531  |w (DE-600)2687025-3  |w (DE-576)401035689  |x 2336-4475  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2012  |g number:1  |g pages:[43]-53 
787 0 8 |i Kommentar zu  |a Martin, Luther H., 1937 -   |t Religious studies as a scientific discipline  |d 2012  |w (DE-627)1743816545 
787 0 8 |i Kommentar in  |a Martin, Luther H., 1937 -   |t Why the possible is not impossible but is unlikely  |d 2012  |w (DE-627)174381660X 
856 4 0 |u https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/125396  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
936 u w |d 20  |j 2012  |e 1  |h [43]-53 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 382998250X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1743816588 
LOK |0 005 20210104162316 
LOK |0 008 210104||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL