Is an unbiased science of religion impossible?

In this paper I present a critical discussion of the essay "Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion" by Luther H. Martin and Donald Wiebe (Religio: Revue pro religionistiku 20/1, 2012, 9-18). The focus of the argumentation lies on the assumptions the aut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Hödl, Hans Gerald 1959- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Společnost [2012]
In: Religio
Jahr: 2012, Band: 20, Heft: 1, Seiten: [19]-26
weitere Schlagwörter:B agent causality
B definition of religion
B religion and meaning
B nature of scientific inquiry
Online Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1743816553
003 DE-627
005 20220630101409.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210104s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 11222.digilib/125393  |2 hdl 
035 |a (DE-627)1743816553 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1743816553 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1013473302  |0 (DE-627)664178456  |0 (DE-576)347168590  |4 aut  |a Hödl, Hans Gerald  |d 1959- 
109 |a Hödl, Hans Gerald 1959- 
245 1 0 |a Is an unbiased science of religion impossible? 
264 1 |c [2012] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper I present a critical discussion of the essay "Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion" by Luther H. Martin and Donald Wiebe (Religio: Revue pro religionistiku 20/1, 2012, 9-18). The focus of the argumentation lies on the assumptions the authors adopt. The authors' understanding of the nature of science, concerning both methodology and the theory of science, is taken into consideration, and their definition of religion is discussed on the background of other definitions available. As an outcome, four questions are formulated that should be taken into account in further discussions of the topic. Finally, some remarks concerning the nature of religions are added. I think that the "Tylorian" definition of religion used by the authors is too narrow and I opt for an understanding of religion as based on the central questions facing human beings about the meaning of life that religions purport to give answers to. The persistence of religion is better explained by the ability of the human being to ask such questions than by the evolutionarily acquired proclivity towards "agent causality". I try to show that this can be achieved at the level of meta-language that is clearly delineated from religious object language. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a agent causality 
650 4 |a definition of religion 
650 4 |a nature of scientific inquiry 
650 4 |a religion and meaning 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religio  |d Brno : Společnost, 1993  |g 20(2012), 1, Seite [19]-26  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)728517531  |w (DE-600)2687025-3  |w (DE-576)401035689  |x 2336-4475  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2012  |g number:1  |g pages:[19]-26 
787 0 8 |i Kommentar zu  |a Martin, Luther H., 1937 -   |t Religious studies as a scientific discipline  |d 2012  |w (DE-627)1743816545 
787 0 8 |i Kommentar in  |a Martin, Luther H., 1937 -   |t Why the possible is not impossible but is unlikely  |d 2012  |w (DE-627)174381660X 
856 4 0 |u https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/125393  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
936 u w |d 20  |j 2012  |e 1  |h [19]-26 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3829982461 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1743816553 
LOK |0 005 20210104162314 
LOK |0 008 210104||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL