Genese og diegese - et problem i den almene narratologi
The author proposes a structural distinction between the petits récits and the grands récits (according to Lyotard), between binary and trivial narrativity, on one hand, and bifurcational and fatal narrativity, on the other: reversibility vs. irreversibility. The ontological implications of the two...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Danois |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Univ.
[1989]
|
| Dans: |
Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
Année: 1989, Volume: 14, Pages: 75-85 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Narratologi
B Diegese B Genese |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | The author proposes a structural distinction between the petits récits and the grands récits (according to Lyotard), between binary and trivial narrativity, on one hand, and bifurcational and fatal narrativity, on the other: reversibility vs. irreversibility. The ontological implications of the two types are distinct, and philosophy should be aware of this categorical difference; narrative theology and “theo-semiotics” in general must do it, if the analysis is correct, as this development of actantial schematism makes it possible to represent, for the first time, a dynamic structure which could be called the geometry of religious meaning. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1904-8181 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.7146/rt.v0i14.5377 |