Daoism and Disability

Ideas found in the early Daoist texts can inform current debates about disability, since the latter often involve assumptions about personhood and agency that Daoist texts do not share. The two canonical texts of classical Daoism, the Daodejing and the Zhuangzi, do not explicitly discuss disability...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Lambert, Andrew (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Druck Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Baylor University Press 2016
In: Disability and world religions
Jahr: 2016, Seiten: 71-92
Online Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1742025722
003 DE-627
005 20210413132020.0
007 tu
008 201204s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
020 |a 9781481305235 
035 |a (DE-627)1742025722 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1742025722 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lambert, Andrew  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Daoism and Disability 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Ideas found in the early Daoist texts can inform current debates about disability, since the latter often involve assumptions about personhood and agency that Daoist texts do not share. The two canonical texts of classical Daoism, the Daodejing and the Zhuangzi, do not explicitly discuss disability as an object of theory or offer a model of it. They do, however, provide conceptual resources that can enrich contemporary discussions of disability. Two particular ideas are discussed here. Classical Daoist thinking about the body undermines normative assumptions about it that attributions of ‘disabled’ often depend upon; and Daoism vividly problematises the common inferential leap from perceived and pronounced incapacity to a more general judgment of “useless”. In conclusion, I suggest that Daoism’s skepticism and particularistic approach to experience suggest caution about the value of appealing to theoretical models of disability. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Disability and world religions  |d Waco, Texas : Baylor University Press, 2016  |g (2016), Seite 71-92  |h xvii, 258 Seiten  |w (DE-627)162264509X  |w (DE-576)481549439  |z 9781481305211  |z 9781481305228  |z 9781481305235  |7 nnnm 
773 1 8 |g year:2016  |g pages:71-92 
856 4 1 |u https://academicworks.cuny.edu/si_pubs/96/  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |j 2016  |h 71-92 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3817254873 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1742025722 
LOK |0 005 20201204045048 
LOK |0 008 201204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)162264509X_2016_71 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a imwa  |a ixau  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL