Sexual rights, Religion and Post-Neoliberalism in Argentina (2003–2015)

This paper examines the relation between sexual politics and post-neoliberalism/populism in Kirchners’ Argentina between 2003 and 2015, focusing on the role of religious actors. Despite the opposition of religious leaders, including that of Archbishop Jorge Bergoglio (now Pope Francis), Argentina ad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Jones, Daniel (VerfasserIn) ; Ariza, Lucía (VerfasserIn) ; Pecheny, Mario (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Brill [2018]
In: Religion & gender
Jahr: 2018, Band: 8, Heft: 1, Seiten: 84-101
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Argentinien / Kirche / Sexualpolitik / Neoliberalismus / Geschichte 1980-2015
RelBib Classification:CG Christentum und Politik
CH Christentum und Gesellschaft
KAJ Kirchengeschichte 1914-; neueste Zeit
KBR Lateinamerika
NBE Anthropologie
NCF Sexualethik
NCH Medizinische Ethik
weitere Schlagwörter:B Argentina
B Sexual Rights
B gender rights
B Catholic Church
B Neoliberalism
Online Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper examines the relation between sexual politics and post-neoliberalism/populism in Kirchners’ Argentina between 2003 and 2015, focusing on the role of religious actors. Despite the opposition of religious leaders, including that of Archbishop Jorge Bergoglio (now Pope Francis), Argentina advanced in the recognition of gender and sexual rights during the Kirchners’ administrations. Conflicts around gender and sexuality, particularly around same-sex marriage, explain some of the tensions between political and religious actors in the period. The focus of this paper on sexual politics shows that the Kirchners’ administrations, unlike other traditional populist or post-neoliberal administrations, had a strong liberal component, which explains the tensions between that populist government and conservative religious actors.
ISSN:1878-5417
Enthält:Enthalten in: Religion & gender
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.18352/rg.10250