Max Weber’s Methodology and the Comparative Sociology of Religion
Max Weber’s methodology is often treated by some as his principal contribution to social science, while his comparative sociology of religion starting with the famous Calvinist thesis is the Schwerpunkt in his work, according to others. There are several reasons to locate and analyze the conjunction...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Univ. Libre de Bruxelles
[2016]
|
| In: |
Revue internationale de philosophie
Year: 2016, Volume: 70, Issue: 2, Pages: 253-272 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1738425371 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201111112635.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201111s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1738425371 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1738425371 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)105325069X |0 (DE-627)789712407 |0 (DE-576)408995181 |4 aut |a Eliæson, Sven |d 1948- | |
| 109 | |a Eliæson, Sven 1948- |a Eliaeson, Sven 1948- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Max Weber’s Methodology and the Comparative Sociology of Religion |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Max Weber’s methodology is often treated by some as his principal contribution to social science, while his comparative sociology of religion starting with the famous Calvinist thesis is the Schwerpunkt in his work, according to others. There are several reasons to locate and analyze the conjunctions between these two interpretations. Weber’s ideal type is formulated in several places, not only in the so-called ‘Objectivity’ essay from 1904, but also for instance in the marginal utility-essay from 1908. His three meta-texts for the three volumes in GARS (Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie) are also illuminating, especially in ‘Einleitung’ (‘Introduction’) and ‘Zwischenbetrachtung’ (or ‘Intermediate Reflections’). It was in the ‘Zwischenbetrachtung’ where he commented on religion in India, partly as an ‘identity giving other’, that the ideal type reappeared. Weber deals with the uniqueness of Occidental culture and his comparative religion serves as supporting evidence, much in line with J S Mill’s canons for the logic of isolating independent variables by similarities and differences -as indicated in a letter by Weber to Georg von Below. As a result Weber serves still today as a sparring partner for theorists of the Axial Age and the multi-modernity paradigm. | ||
| 601 | |a Weber, Max | ||
| 601 | |a Methodologie | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Revue internationale de philosophie |d Bruxelles : Univ. Libre de Bruxelles, 1938 |g 70(2016,2)=276 S. 253-272 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)602534801 |w (DE-600)2500063-9 |w (DE-576)433004657 |x 2033-0138 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:70 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:253-272 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-philosophie-2016-2-page-253.htm |x Verlag |
| 936 | u | w | |d 70 |j 2016 |e 2 |h 253-272 |y 70(2016,2)=276 S. 253-272 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3798689962 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1738425371 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201111112005 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201111||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||