A Hydra-Logical Approach: Acknowledging Complexity in the Study of Religion, Science, and Technology
Scholarship has grown increasingly nuanced in its grappling with the intersections of religion, science, and technology but requires a new paradigm. Contemporary approaches to specific technologies reveal a wide variety of perspectives but remain too often committed to typological classification. To...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2020]
|
Dans: |
Zygon
Année: 2020, Volume: 55, Numéro: 4, Pages: 948-970 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Religion
/ Sciences de la nature
/ Science des religions
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AB Philosophie de la religion CF Christianisme et science |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Religion and science
B Artificial Intelligence B Classification B Method B Typology B Ian Barbour B climate science |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | Scholarship has grown increasingly nuanced in its grappling with the intersections of religion, science, and technology but requires a new paradigm. Contemporary approaches to specific technologies reveal a wide variety of perspectives but remain too often committed to typological classification. To be vigilant of our obligation to understand and reveal, scholars in the study of religion, science, and technology can adopt a hydra-logical stance: we can recognize that there are cultural monsters possessing scientific, technological, and religious heads. These heads may work with a common agenda or they might not. They might disagree, pulling their shared body back and forth in a public commotion that lays waste to their surroundings. They might see past one another or move in tandem—purposively or not. Evaluations of climate response and AI benefit from seeing how the various heads are inseparable: indeed, cutting one off simply promotes the growth of new heads. Methodological and analytical clarity, therefore, emerges in the transition from schemes of classification to the recognition of hydras. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12650 |