The Role of Canon in the Study of Hinduism and Some Notes About Bourdieu: A Response to Stephen L. Young

This response to Stephen Young’s article begins with his use of the term doxa, drawn from Pierre Bourdieu. For Bourdieu doxa are the unspoken assumptions that undergird social hierarchy, assumptions that are only exposed during times of historical change. It is unclear if Young intends that the expo...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Llewellyn, John Earl 1957- (Auteur)
Collaborateurs: Young, Stephen L. (Antécédent bibliographique)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill [2020]
Dans: Method & theory in the study of religion
Année: 2020, Volume: 32, Numéro: 4/5, Pages: 373-379
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Bourdieu, Pierre 1930-2002 / Nordamerika / Hindouisme / Canon / Exégèse / Contenu de la foi / Protectionnisme
RelBib Classification:AA Sciences des religions
AB Philosophie de la religion
BK Hindouisme
HC Nouveau Testament
Sujets non-standardisés:B Stephen Young
B Hindu studies
B Pierre Bourdieu
B Doxa
B protectionism
B Hindu canon
B New Testament
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This response to Stephen Young’s article begins with his use of the term doxa, drawn from Pierre Bourdieu. For Bourdieu doxa are the unspoken assumptions that undergird social hierarchy, assumptions that are only exposed during times of historical change. It is unclear if Young intends that the exposure of what he calls New Testament studies’ “protectionism” is a sign that the field has undergone such a change. The second part of the response is about the applicability of this kind of analysis to the study of Hinduism in North America, concluding that protectionism concerning the interpretation of the scriptural canon does not seem to be operative there. However, there is a more or less similar controversy about the study of Hinduism by outsiders.
ISSN:1570-0682
Référence:Kritik von "“Let’s Take the Text Seriously” (2019)"
Contient:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341482