Is it ethical for for-profit firms to practice a religion?: a Rawlsian thought experiment

Recent judicial rulings and changes in federal and state legislation have given for-profit corporations a growing list of rights and constitutional protections, including the right to practice religion free from many types of federal or state restriction. In this paper, we highlight the implications...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Bone, Paula Fitzgerald (Auteur) ; Langenderfer, Jeff (Auteur) ; Fitzgerald, Megan Lynn (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2020
Dans: Journal of business ethics
Année: 2020, Volume: 166, Numéro: 1, Pages: 159-174
Sujets non-standardisés:B Rawls’ Theory of Justice
B Public Policy
B Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
B Corporate religious practice
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Recent judicial rulings and changes in federal and state legislation have given for-profit corporations a growing list of rights and constitutional protections, including the right to practice religion free from many types of federal or state restriction. In this paper, we highlight the implications of these developments using Rawls’ (A theory of justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971) Theory of Justice to explore the consequences of for-profit corporate religious freedom for consumers and employees. We identify preliminary principles to spark a discussion as to how expanding religious freedom for businesses and fair access to goods and services can coexist in the for-profit marketplace.
ISSN:1573-0697
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04136-5