Making sense of the study of spirituality: late modernity on trial
In this article I offer a meta-theoretical mapping of spirituality studies and its many controversies. I begin by distinguishing between two projects that together constitute the field: the study for and the study of spirituality. I argue a good deal of the confusion surrounding ‘spirituality’ is th...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Religion
Année: 2020, Volume: 50, Numéro: 4, Pages: 590-614 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Spiritualité
/ Science des religions
/ Histoire 1960-2020
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AG Vie religieuse AZ Nouveau mouvement religieux |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Spirituality
B Romanticism B Late Modernity B Social Theory B theory and method |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | In this article I offer a meta-theoretical mapping of spirituality studies and its many controversies. I begin by distinguishing between two projects that together constitute the field: the study for and the study of spirituality. I argue a good deal of the confusion surrounding ‘spirituality’ is the result of scholars failing to make this distinction. Next, I outline the few areas of agreement within the study of spirituality in order to illuminate what I consider the issue that defines the field: the merits and shortcomings of late modernity. By late modernity I mean the current era, whose origins can be traced roughly to the 1960s. I then offer a meta-theoretical analysis of the social-cum-political theoretical frameworks commonly used to study spirituality, delineating them according to their assessments of the contemporary epoch. I contend this is a useful and much-needed means of dispelling some of the fuzziness that characterizes the field. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1096-1151 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2020.1758229 |