Response to Jennifer Hockenbery Dragseth's review of Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen (ed.), The Alternative Luther: Lutheran Theology from the Subaltern
This is a response to Jennifer Hockenbery Dragseth's review of Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen (ed.), The Alternative Luther: Lutheran Theology from the Subaltern. Dragseth delivers a prudent and insightful review of the book. I agree with Dragseht's points, thus I will here make no more than a...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Dialog
Année: 2020, Volume: 59, Numéro: 3, Pages: 247-249 |
| RelBib Classification: | BH Judaïsme CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses KAG Réforme; humanisme; Renaissance |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
queer and equal sexualities
B the Anthropocene B Language and hermeneutics B post-colonial and subaltern studies B non-violence against women B the Alternative Luther B Luther as precarious |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This is a response to Jennifer Hockenbery Dragseth's review of Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen (ed.), The Alternative Luther: Lutheran Theology from the Subaltern. Dragseth delivers a prudent and insightful review of the book. I agree with Dragseht's points, thus I will here make no more than a few deepening points in addition to those. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1540-6385 |
| Référence: | Kritik von "A Theological Review of a Lutheran Theology from the Subaltern (2020)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Dialog
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/dial.12601 |