Response to Jennifer Hockenbery Dragseth's review of Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen (ed.), The Alternative Luther: Lutheran Theology from the Subaltern
This is a response to Jennifer Hockenbery Dragseth's review of Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen (ed.), The Alternative Luther: Lutheran Theology from the Subaltern. Dragseth delivers a prudent and insightful review of the book. I agree with Dragseht's points, thus I will here make no more than a...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Beteiligte: | |
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2020]
|
In: |
Dialog
Jahr: 2020, Band: 59, Heft: 3, Seiten: 247-249 |
RelBib Classification: | BH Judentum CC Christentum und nichtchristliche Religionen; interreligiöse Beziehungen KAG Kirchengeschichte 1500-1648; Reformation; Humanismus; Renaissance |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
queer and equal sexualities
B the Anthropocene B Language and hermeneutics B post-colonial and subaltern studies B non-violence against women B the Alternative Luther B Luther as precarious |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Zusammenfassung: | This is a response to Jennifer Hockenbery Dragseth's review of Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen (ed.), The Alternative Luther: Lutheran Theology from the Subaltern. Dragseth delivers a prudent and insightful review of the book. I agree with Dragseht's points, thus I will here make no more than a few deepening points in addition to those. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1540-6385 |
Bezug: | Kritik von "A Theological Review of a Lutheran Theology from the Subaltern (2020)"
|
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Dialog
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/dial.12601 |