Methodology in Science and Religion: A Reply to Critics

Debates about methodology have been central to the emergence of the “field of science of religion.” Two questions that have motivated scholars in that field over the past half century: “is it theoretically justifiable to bring scientific and religious beliefs into dialogue?” and “can theology be rat...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Reeves, Josh A. 1976- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
Dans: Zygon
Année: 2020, Volume: 55, Numéro: 3, Pages: 824-836
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Religion / Sciences de la nature / Méthodologie
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
CF Christianisme et science
Sujets non-standardisés:B philosophy of science
B Critical Realism
B Scientific Method
B Theological Method
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1728065429
003 DE-627
005 20201012120715.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200831s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/zygo.12630  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1728065429 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1728065429 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042549427  |0 (DE-627)769102573  |0 (DE-576)391776991  |4 aut  |a Reeves, Josh A.  |d 1976- 
109 |a Reeves, Josh A. 1976-  |a Reeves, Josh 1976- 
245 1 0 |a Methodology in Science and Religion  |b A Reply to Critics 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Debates about methodology have been central to the emergence of the “field of science of religion.” Two questions that have motivated scholars in that field over the past half century: “is it theoretically justifiable to bring scientific and religious beliefs into dialogue?” and “can theology be rational in the same way as science?” This article responds to commentary on Against Methodology: Recent Debates on Rationality and Theology, a book which critically examines three major methodologists of recent years: Nancey Murphy, Alister McGrath, and J. Wentzel van Huyssteen. Themes raised in the commentary include the status of realism and truth in science, the unity of science, the adequacy of the term “critical realism,” proper ways of seeking legitimacy for an academic discipline, and new directions for the field of science and religion. 
601 |a Methodologie 
650 4 |a Critical Realism 
650 4 |a philosophy of science 
650 4 |a Scientific Method 
650 4 |a Theological Method 
652 |a AB:CF 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049396-9  |0 (DE-627)106187155  |0 (DE-576)209081880  |2 gnd  |a Religion 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4041421-8  |0 (DE-627)106219324  |0 (DE-576)209044837  |2 gnd  |a Naturwissenschaften 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4139716-2  |0 (DE-627)105633291  |0 (DE-576)209696737  |2 gnd  |a Methodologie 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 55(2020), 3, Seite 824-836  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:55  |g year:2020  |g number:3  |g pages:824-836 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/zygo.12630  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12630  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 55  |j 2020  |e 3  |h 824-836 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3744614344 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1728065429 
LOK |0 005 20201012120715 
LOK |0 008 200831||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144204389X  |a CF 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Methodology,Natural sciences,Natural sciences,Natural science,Science in literature,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature 
STB 0 0 |a Méthodologie,Religion,Religions,Religion,Sciences de la nature,Sciences de la nature,Sciences,Sciences,Sciences (motif),Sciences 
STC 0 0 |a Ciencias naturales,Ciencias naturales,Metodología,Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Metodologia,Religione,Religione,Religione,Scienze naturali,Scienze naturali 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,自然科学,自然科学 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,方法論,自然科學,自然科學 
STG 0 0 |a Ciências naturais,Ciências naturais,Metodologia,Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Естественные науки (мотив),Естественные науки,Методология,Религия (мотив),Религия 
STI 0 0 |a Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Μεθοδολογία,Φυσικές επιστήμες (μοτίβο),Φυσικές επιστήμες 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Naturforschung,Naturlehre,Naturwissenschaft,Naturforschung,Naturlehre,Naturwissenschaft , Methodenlehre,Methodik