The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism
Which metaphysical theories are involved—whether presupposed or implied—in Marquis’ future-like-ours (FLO) argument against abortion? Vogelstein has recently argued that the supporter of the FLO argument faces a problematic dilemma; in particular, Marquis, the main supporter of the argument, seems t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2018]
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2018, Volume: 32, Issue: 3, Pages: 199-204 |
| RelBib Classification: | VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
unrestricted composition
B Contraception B future-like-ours argument B Abortion B Animalism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727582691 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210906152644.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200821s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12417 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727582691 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727582691 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)115380168X |0 (DE-627)101531757X |0 (DE-576)500565511 |4 aut |a Sauchelli, Andrea | |
| 109 | |a Sauchelli, Andrea | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Which metaphysical theories are involved—whether presupposed or implied—in Marquis’ future-like-ours (FLO) argument against abortion? Vogelstein has recently argued that the supporter of the FLO argument faces a problematic dilemma; in particular, Marquis, the main supporter of the argument, seems to have to either (a) abandon diachronic universalism (DU) or (b) acquiesce and declare that contraception is morally wrong. I argue that the premises of Marquis’ argument can be reasonably combined with a form of unrestricted composition and that the FLO argument is better viewed as including animalism, i.e., the thesis that we are animals. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Abortion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Animalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contraception | |
| 650 | 4 | |a future-like-ours argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a unrestricted composition | |
| 652 | |a VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 32(2018), 3, Seite 199-204 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2018 |g number:3 |g pages:199-204 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12417 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12417 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 32 |j 2018 |e 3 |h 199-204 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3741579629 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727582691 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210906152644 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200821||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||