Not a matter of parental choice but of social justice obligation: Children are owed measles vaccination

This article presents arguments that reframe the discussion on vaccination ethics. The correct starting point for discussions on vaccination ethics is not what society owes parents, but rather what society owes children. Drawing on the justice theory of Powers and Faden, two conclusions are defended...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Bioethics
Auteur principal: Bester, Johan C. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2018]
Dans: Bioethics
Année: 2018, Volume: 32, Numéro: 9, Pages: 611-619
RelBib Classification:NCH Éthique médicale
ZC Politique en général
Sujets non-standardisés:B Justice
B pediatric ethics
B vaccination policy
B Public Health Ethics
B vaccination ethics
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This article presents arguments that reframe the discussion on vaccination ethics. The correct starting point for discussions on vaccination ethics is not what society owes parents, but rather what society owes children. Drawing on the justice theory of Powers and Faden, two conclusions are defended by presenting and defending a set of arguments. First, a just society is obligated to protect its children against serious vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles through adequate levels of vaccination. Second, this obligation of the just society rests on identifiable individuals and institutions: parents, healthcare professionals, government, and vaccine producers have important obligations in this regard. This removes vaccination out of the realm of individual or parental discretion, and situates it in the realm of societal obligation. Children are owed vaccination, society is obligated to provide it. If parents cannot or will not provide it, society ought to respond.
ISSN:1467-8519
Contient:Enthalten in: Bioethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12511