No conscientious objection without normative justification: A reply
Benjamin Zolf, in his recent paper ‘No conscientious objection without normative justification: Against conscientious objection in medicine’, attempts to establish that in order to rule out arbitrary conscientious objections, a reasonability constraint is necessary. This, he contends, requires norma...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Bioethics
Année: 2019, Volume: 33, Numéro: 4, Pages: 522-523 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCB Éthique individuelle VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
reasonability
B Conscientious Objection B Medical Ethics B Conscience |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727507916 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210927093120.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12552 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727507916 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727507916 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Blackshaw, Bruce P. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a No conscientious objection without normative justification |b A reply |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Benjamin Zolf, in his recent paper ‘No conscientious objection without normative justification: Against conscientious objection in medicine’, attempts to establish that in order to rule out arbitrary conscientious objections, a reasonability constraint is necessary. This, he contends, requires normative justification, and the subjective beliefs that ground conscientious objections cannot easily be judged by normative criteria. Zolf shows that the alternative of using extrinsic criteria, such as requiring that unjustified harm must not be caused, are likewise grounded on normative criteria. He concludes that conscientious objection is therefore untenable. Here, I present an alternative account, based on the value we are willing to place on conscientious objection as an expression of freedom of conscience and religion. Using an extrinsic criterion such as harm, we can make a judgement of what degree of harm should be tolerated as the cost of permitting conscientious objection. A normative criterion for judging individual claims is therefore not required. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Conscience | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conscientious Objection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a reasonability | |
| 652 | |a NCB:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 33(2019), 4, Seite 522-523 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2019 |g number:4 |g pages:522-523 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12552 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12552 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 33 |j 2019 |e 4 |h 522-523 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3741286982 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727507916 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220121160648 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052813 |a NCB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||