The German debate on male circumcision and Habermas’ model of post-secularity

This paper considers Habermas’ model of a post-secular political order in the light of the debate on male circumcision that arose in Germany after a court ruled that male circumcision was an unjustifiable act of bodily harm. Central to this model is the idea that religious reasons can only become ef...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Greve, Jens (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 33, Issue: 4, Pages: 457-466
RelBib Classification:AG Religious life; material religion
KBB German language area
NCH Medical ethics
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B religious and secular reasons
B male circumcision
B post-secularity
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727507835
003 DE-627
005 20220121160900.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200820s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12526  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727507835 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727507835 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)136578950  |0 (DE-627)584889550  |0 (DE-576)301090939  |4 aut  |a Greve, Jens 
109 |a Greve, Jens 
245 1 4 |a The German debate on male circumcision and Habermas’ model of post-secularity 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper considers Habermas’ model of a post-secular political order in the light of the debate on male circumcision that arose in Germany after a court ruled that male circumcision was an unjustifiable act of bodily harm. Central to this model is the idea that religious reasons can only become effective in central legal institutions when they are translated into secular reasons. My paper demonstrates that there are two distinguishable readings of this proviso. On the one hand, there is a broad reading according to which it is only necessary to reach a conclusion that is in line with the democratic principle stating that all citizens can be regarded as co-legislators even if non-generalizable value orientations might then shape the interpretation of fundamental rights (in the case of circumcision, the right to bodily integrity). On the other hand, a truly secular (narrow) reading would avoid the inclusion of non-generalizable value orientations. The debate on circumcision demonstrates that these two interpretations lead to different and conflicting modes of justification. The broad reading allows for a justification of male circumcision, whereas the narrow reading makes such a justification unlikely. In addition, the filtering function of the proviso is weakened in a broad reading. 
650 4 |a male circumcision 
650 4 |a post-secularity 
650 4 |a religious and secular reasons 
652 |a AG:KBB:NCH:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 33(2019), 4, Seite 457-466  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2019  |g number:4  |g pages:457-466 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12526  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12526  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 33  |j 2019  |e 4  |h 457-466 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3741286907 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727507835 
LOK |0 005 20220121160900 
LOK |0 008 200820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044721  |a KBB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043229  |a AG 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL