Covert moral bioenhancement, public health, and autonomy

In a recent article in this journal, Parker Crutchfield argues that if moral bioenhancement ought to be compulsory, as some authors claim, then it ought to be covert, i.e., performed without the knowledge of the population that is being morally enhanced. Crutchfield argues that since the aim of comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Zambrano, Alexander (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Crutchfield, Parker (VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
In: Bioethics
Jahr: 2019, Band: 33, Heft: 6, Seiten: 725-728
RelBib Classification:NCH Medizinische Ethik
ZD Psychologie
weitere Schlagwörter:B moral enhancement
B Harm
B Public Health Ethics
B Autonomy
Online Zugang: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a recent article in this journal, Parker Crutchfield argues that if moral bioenhancement ought to be compulsory, as some authors claim, then it ought to be covert, i.e., performed without the knowledge of the population that is being morally enhanced. Crutchfield argues that since the aim of compulsory moral bioenhancement is to prevent ultimate harm to the population, compulsory moral bioenhancement is best categorized as a public health issue, and should therefore be governed by the norms and values that apply in public health settings. In this article, I argue for two related claims. First, I question the extent to which compulsory moral enhancement should be considered a public health issue that ought to be governed by the norms and values that apply in public health settings. Second, I argue that Crutchfield's argument that covert moral bioenhancement would better respect people's autonomy than an overt program overlooks two important autonomy-based reasons that, in fact, favor an overt moral enhancement program over a covert one.
ISSN:1467-8519
Bezug:Kritik von "Compulsory moral bioenhancement should be covert (2019)"
Kritik in "It is better to be ignorant of our moral enhancement (2020)"
Enthält:Enthalten in: Bioethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12567