Eric Perl’s Theophanism: An Option for Agnostics?
Recent work in analytic philosophy of religion has seen increased interest in nontheistic, but still non-naturalist (indeed, broadly religious) worldview options. J.L. Schellenberg’s Ultimism has been among the most prominent of these. Another interesting option that has yet to receive much attentio...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
MDPI
[2020]
|
| In: |
Religions
Year: 2020, Volume: 11, Issue: 3 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theism
B Atheism B Eric B Perl B Agnosticism B God B Neoplatonism B Orthodoxy |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727128419 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210127090403.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200817s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel11050251 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727128419 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727128419 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dumsday, Travis |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Dumsday, Travis | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Eric Perl’s Theophanism |b An Option for Agnostics? |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Recent work in analytic philosophy of religion has seen increased interest in nontheistic, but still non-naturalist (indeed, broadly religious) worldview options. J.L. Schellenberg’s Ultimism has been among the most prominent of these. Another interesting option that has yet to receive much attention is the Theophanism advocated by the Neoplatonism scholar Eric Perl. In this paper, I summarize Perl’s theophanism (which he describes as being neither theistic nor atheistic) and assess it on two fronts: (a) whether it might be an acceptable philosophical option for agnostics, specifically, and (b) to what extent it is independently defensible philosophically. | ||
| 601 | |a Theophanie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Eric | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neoplatonism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Perl | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Agnosticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Atheism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Orthodoxy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 11(2020,5) Artikel 251 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |
| 856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/5/251/pdf?version=1589896314 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/5/251 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11050251 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 11 |j 2020 |e 3 |y 11(2020,5) Artikel 251 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3740446005 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727128419 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200817084710 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200817||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||