Religious Studies: Back to the Future : A Response to Markus Davidsen
The author appreciates Davidsen’s concern with the future of Religious Studies, but thinks that its strength lies in being an interdisciplinary field of study. The field has the potential to bring together scholars involved in the study of religion and demonstrate its relevance by generating insight...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Beteiligte: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Amsterdam University Press
[2020]
|
| In: |
NTT
Jahr: 2020, Band: 74, Heft: 3, Seiten: 263-266 |
| RelBib Classification: | AA Religionswissenschaft FB Theologiestudium KBD Beneluxländer |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Theology
B Religious Studies B Anthropology B Interdisciplinary |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | The author appreciates Davidsen’s concern with the future of Religious Studies, but thinks that its strength lies in being an interdisciplinary field of study. The field has the potential to bring together scholars involved in the study of religion and demonstrate its relevance by generating insights into complex, relevant and pressing problems. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2590-3268 |
| Bezug: | Kritik von "Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisited (2020)"
Kritik in "Fundamental Problems and Methods in the Study of Religion (2020)" |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: NTT
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/NTT2020.3.005.VENB |