What ontological arguments don’t show
Daniel Dombrowski contends that: (1) a number of versions of the ontological argument [OA] are sound; (2) the deity whose existence is most well established by the OA is the deity picked out by Hartshorne’s neoclassical concept of God; (3) skeptics who insist that the OA only shows that “if God exis...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2020]
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 88, Issue: 1, Pages: 97-114 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Existence of God
/ Ontological proof of God's existence
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1725078198 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200827172935.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200717s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-019-09718-x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1725078198 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1725078198 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1115259261 |0 (DE-627)869648373 |0 (DE-576)477695620 |4 aut |a Engel, Mylan |d 1960- | |
| 109 | |a Engel, Mylan 1960- |a Engel, Mylan Jr. 1960- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What ontological arguments don’t show |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Daniel Dombrowski contends that: (1) a number of versions of the ontological argument [OA] are sound; (2) the deity whose existence is most well established by the OA is the deity picked out by Hartshorne’s neoclassical concept of God; (3) skeptics who insist that the OA only shows that “if God exists, then God exists necessarily” are contradicting themselves, and (4) the OA is worth a great deal since it effectively demonstrates the rationality of theism. I argue that theses (2) and (3) are clearly false and offer a presumptive case for thinking that (4) is false, since, absent an independent proof of God’s existence, the theist appears to be in no position to rationally assert (1). I also show that the Anselmian OA harmonizes rather poorly with a Hartshornean neoclassical conception of God. I conclude by assessing the philosophical and dialectical worth of ontological arguments vis-à-vis establishing the rationality of theism. | ||
| 601 | |a Ontologie | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4131943-6 |0 (DE-627)10415165X |0 (DE-576)209631457 |2 gnd |a Gottesfrage |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4139857-9 |0 (DE-627)10440888X |0 (DE-576)20969789X |2 gnd |a Ontologischer Gottesbeweis |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 88(2020), 1, Seite 97-114 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:88 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:97-114 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-019-09718-x |x Verlag |
| 936 | u | w | |d 88 |j 2020 |e 1 |h 97-114 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 372553862X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1725078198 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200827172935 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200717||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Existence of God,God,God question,Ontological proof of God's existence,Ontological argument,God's existence |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Preuve ontologique de l’existence de Dieu,Argument ontologique,Argument ontologique,Question de l’existence de Dieu |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Cuestión de la existencia de Dios,Prueba ontológica de la existencia de Dios |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Prova ontologica dell'esistenza di Dio,Argomento ontologico,Argomento ontologico,Questione dell'esistenza di Dio |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 神存在的提问,上帝的存在性,上帝存在的提问,神存在的本体论论证,神存在的存有论论证 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 神存在的提問,上帝的存在性,上帝存在的提問,神存在的本體論論證,神存在的存有論論證 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Prova ontológica da existência de Deus,Questão da existência de Deus |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Вопрос о существовании Бога,Онтологическое доказательство существования Бога |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ερώτημα της ύπαρξης του Θεού,Οντολογική απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Existenz Gottes |