Is critique possible in the study of lived religion? Anthropological and feminist reflections
This article, based on the author’s fieldwork in a Catholic context, aims to theorise the dilemmas of taking seriously religious worlds at precisely those moments when they may be in tension with academic worldviews in terms of epistemology and ontology. The lived religion approach has emerged as a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Carfax Publ.
2020
|
| In: |
Journal of contemporary religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 35, Issue: 2, Pages: 251-268 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Catholicism
/ Field-research
/ Popular piety
/ Science of Religion
/ Feminism
/ Criticism
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AD Sociology of religion; religious policy AG Religious life; material religion CB Christian life; spirituality |
| Further subjects: | B
Lived Religion
B Phenomenological Anthropology B Catholicism B ontological turn B feminist critique |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1724770748 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230330152803.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200714s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13537903.2020.1759904 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1724770748 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1724770748 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1037419111 |0 (DE-627)755690877 |0 (DE-576)39144039X |4 aut |a Knibbe, Kim Esther | |
| 109 | |a Knibbe, Kim Esther |a Knibbe, Kim |a Knibbe, Kim E. |a Knibbe, K. E. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is critique possible in the study of lived religion? Anthropological and feminist reflections |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article, based on the author’s fieldwork in a Catholic context, aims to theorise the dilemmas of taking seriously religious worlds at precisely those moments when they may be in tension with academic worldviews in terms of epistemology and ontology. The lived religion approach has emerged as a critical enterprise which serves as a corrective to more text-based or macro-sociological approaches, developing a form of radical non-reductionism and a preference for ethnographic approaches. This article aims to explore this critical edge of the lived religion approach further to address the modernist legacy in the study of religion. It will do so by bringing two anthropological approaches into the conversation that both challenge, albeit in different ways, the modernist underpinnings of studying religion within anthropology: phenomenological anthropology and what is called ‘the ontological turn’. The second part of the article centres on the question whether critique is possible in the pursuit of a non-reductionist approach to studying lived religion, taking up the question ‘is critique secular?’ posed by Talal Asad et al. This article suggests ways to take the impossibility of critique forward by following up some directions within the anthropological approaches already presented and linking this with feminist thinking on the status and role of academic knowledge. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 601 | |a Feminist | ||
| 601 | |a Anthropologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Catholicism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Lived Religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a feminist critique | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ontological turn | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Phenomenological Anthropology | |
| 652 | |a AA:AD:AG:CB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4030027-4 |0 (DE-627)106272047 |0 (DE-576)20898528X |2 gnd |a Katholizismus |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4016674-0 |0 (DE-627)106332309 |0 (DE-576)208916911 |2 gnd |a Feldforschung |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4121880-2 |0 (DE-627)105766402 |0 (DE-576)20954693X |2 gnd |a Volksfrömmigkeit |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049426-3 |0 (DE-627)106187058 |0 (DE-576)209082003 |2 gnd |a Religionswissenschaft |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4222126-2 |0 (DE-627)104499168 |0 (DE-576)210278633 |2 gnd |a Feminismus |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4033229-9 |0 (DE-627)104137800 |0 (DE-576)209000694 |2 gnd |a Kritik |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of contemporary religion |d Basingstoke, Hants [u.a.] : Carfax Publ., 1995 |g 35(2020), 2, Seite 251-268 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320501132 |w (DE-600)2012230-5 |w (DE-576)095237976 |x 1469-9419 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2020 |g number:2 |g pages:251-268 |
| 856 | |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13537903.2020.1759904?needAccess=true |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2020.1759904 |x Verlag |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |
| 936 | u | w | |d 35 |j 2020 |e 2 |h 251-268 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3724289324 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1724770748 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201028111038 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200714||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042966 |a AA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043229 |a AG | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043768 |a CB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Catholicism,Catholicism,Criticism,Criticism,Feminism,Feminist theory,Field-research,Field-work,Popular piety,Popular piety,Popular devotion,Science of Religion,Religious studies,Religionswissenschaft,Religions |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Catholicisme,Catholicisme,Critique,Critique,Féminisme,Théorie féministe,Recherche sur le terrain,Travail de terrain,Travail de terrain,Religiosité populaire,Religiosité populaire,Science des religions |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Catolicismo,Catolicismo,Ciencias de la religión,Crítica,Crítica,Feminismo,Investigación de campo,Religiosidad popular,Religiosidad popular |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Cattolicesimo,Cattolicesimo,Critica,Critica,Devozione popolare <motivo>,Devozione popolare,Pietà popolare,Pietà popolare,Pietà popolare (motivo),Pietà popolare,Femminismo,Ricerca sul campo,Scienze religiose |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 天主教,天主教,罗马公教,罗马公教,女性主义,女权运动,女权主义,宗教学,实地研究,实地考察,田野调查,批评,批判,评论,民间信仰 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 天主教,天主教,羅馬公教,羅馬公教,女性主義,女權運動,女權主義,宗教學,實地研究,實地考察,田野調查,批評,批判,評論,民間信仰 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Catolicismo,Catolicismo,Ciências da religião,Crítica,Crítica,Feminismo,Pesquisa de campo,Religiosidade popular,Religiosidade popular |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Католицизм (мотив),Католицизм,Критика (мотив),Критика,Народные верования (мотив),Народные верования,Полевое исследование,Религиоведение,Феминизм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Έρευνα πεδίου,Θρησκειολογία,Καθολικισμός (μοτίβο),Καθολικισμός,Κριτική (μοτίβο),Κριτική,Λαϊκή ευσέβεια (μοτίβο),Λαϊκή ευσέβεια,Φεμινισμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Katholiken , Feldarbeit <Empirische Sozialforschung>,Feldstudie,Field-research,Field-work,Field research,Feldexperiment,Feldstudie,Feldversuch,Field experiment,Field study,Participant observation,Teilnehmende Beobachtung,Feldarbeit,Feldstudie,Field-research,Field-work , Volksreligiosität,Volksreligiösität,Volksreligiosität,Lived religion , Religious studies,Religionsphilosophie,Scholasticism,Scholastik,Theologie,Theology,Religionsforschung , Feministische Theorie,Feministische Theorie |