Does “Mental Slavery” Exist?: An Expert Opinion
In August 2018, lawyers representing Daniel Ambash requested five leading scholars of new religious movements to prepare an expert opinion on whether something called “mental slavery” is generally recognized as a feature of the controversial new religious movement labeled as “cults” by their opponen...
| Auteurs: | ; ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
[2018]
|
| Dans: |
The journal of CESNUR
Année: 2018, Volume: 2, Numéro: 6, Pages: 74-97 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Margaret Singer
B Anti-cult Movements B Deprogramming B Mental Slavery B Mind Control B Brainwashing |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | In August 2018, lawyers representing Daniel Ambash requested five leading scholars of new religious movements to prepare an expert opinion on whether something called “mental slavery” is generally recognized as a feature of the controversial new religious movement labeled as “cults” by their opponents. The scholars accepted to prepare an opinion pro bono (i.e. without requesting or accepting any honorary) on the general issue of “mental slavery,” summarizing or reproducing their previous work, without directly addressing the case of Daniel Ambash. Their conclusion was that “mental slavery” is simply used in this context as a synonym for “brainwashing,” and that brainwashing theories have been debunked long ago as pseudo-scientific tools used to limit religious liberty of unpopular minorities and justify the criminal practice of deprogramming. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2532-2990 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: The journal of CESNUR
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.26338/tjoc.2018.2.6.6 |