Why are Women More Religious than Men? Do Risk Preferences and Genetic Risk Predispositions Explain the Gender Gap?

Risk preference theory argues that the gender gap in religiosity is caused by greater female risk aversion. Although widely debated, risk preference theory has been inadequately tested. Our study tests the theory directly with phenotypic and genetic risk preferences in three dimensions—general, impu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Li, Yi (Author) ; Woodberry, Robert Dudley (Author) ; Guo, Guang (Author) ; Liu, Hexuan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
In: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 59, Issue: 2, Pages: 289-310
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Woman / Religiosity
RelBib Classification:AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
ZB Sociology
Further subjects:B genetic risk preferences
B Gender
B Religiosity
B risk preferences
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1700588095
003 DE-627
005 20220706174929.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200615s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/jssr.12657  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1700588095 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1700588095 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1261942221  |0 (DE-627)1809336945  |4 aut  |a Li, Yi 
109 |a Li, Yi  |a Yi Li  |a 李毅 
245 1 0 |a Why are Women More Religious than Men? Do Risk Preferences and Genetic Risk Predispositions Explain the Gender Gap? 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Risk preference theory argues that the gender gap in religiosity is caused by greater female risk aversion. Although widely debated, risk preference theory has been inadequately tested. Our study tests the theory directly with phenotypic and genetic risk preferences in three dimensions—general, impulsive, and sensation-seeking risk. Moreover, we examine whether the effects of different dimensions of risk preferences on the gender gap vary across different dimensions of religiosity. We find that general and impulsive risk preferences do not explain gender differences in religiosity, whereas sensation-seeking risk preference makes the gender gap in self-assessed religiousness and church attendance insignificant, but not belief in God, prayer, or importance of religion. Genetic risk preferences do not remove any of the gender gaps in religiosity, suggesting that the causal order is not from risk preference to religiosity. Evidence suggests that risk preferences are not a strong predictor for gender differences in religiosity. 
650 4 |a Gender 
650 4 |a genetic risk preferences 
650 4 |a Religiosity 
650 4 |a risk preferences 
652 |a AD:ZB 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4018202-2  |0 (DE-627)104270705  |0 (DE-576)208923209  |2 gnd  |a Frau 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049428-7  |0 (DE-627)10618704X  |0 (DE-576)209082011  |2 gnd  |a Religiosität 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1191220532  |0 (DE-627)1669659224  |4 aut  |a Woodberry, Robert Dudley 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)170973956  |0 (DE-627)061127574  |0 (DE-576)131807099  |4 aut  |a Guo, Guang 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1261942272  |0 (DE-627)1809337097  |4 aut  |a Liu, Hexuan 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal for the scientific study of religion  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1961  |g 59(2020), 2, Seite 289-310  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320634809  |w (DE-600)2024375-3  |w (DE-576)093888538  |x 1468-5906  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:59  |g year:2020  |g number:2  |g pages:289-310 
856 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566885  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via pmcid lookup)] 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jssr.12657  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12657  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 59  |j 2020  |e 2  |h 289-310 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3687315339 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1700588095 
LOK |0 005 20200904130415 
LOK |0 008 200615||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2020-06-10#B4FB7A82F3419B44E2C6E0619A330BDC0E57FBBA 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043016  |a AD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053755  |a ZB 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Religiosity,Woman,Adult woman,Women,Women,Women in art 
STB 0 0 |a Femme,Femme,Femmes,Femmes,Religiosité 
STC 0 0 |a Mujer,Mujer,Mujeres,Religiosidad 
STD 0 0 |a Donna,Donna,Religiosità 
STE 0 0 |a 女人,女人,女残疾人土,妇女,女子,妇女,女子,宗教性 
STF 0 0 |a 女人,女人,女殘疾人土,婦女,女子,婦女,女子,宗教性 
STG 0 0 |a Mulher,Mulher,Religiosidade 
STH 0 0 |a Женщина (мотив),Женщина,Религиозность 
STI 0 0 |a Γυναίκα (μοτίβο),Γυναίκα,Θρησκευτικότητα 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Soziales Geschlecht,Geschlecht,Geschlecht 
SYG 0 0 |a Frauen,Frauendarstellung,Frauengestalt,Frauenbild,Erwachsene Frau,Weib,Weibliche Erwachsene,Frauen , Religiösität,Religiösität