Justifying blasphemy laws: freedom of expression, public morals, and international human rights law
In its General Comment No. 34 dealing with freedom of expression, the United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) rejected the idea that a blasphemy law could ever be human-rights compliant, unless its function was to prevent incitement to religious or racial hatred. This is a widely shared view t...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Journal of law and religion
Année: 2020, Volume: 35, Numéro: 1, Pages: 33-60 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Vereinte Nationen, Internationales Menschenrechtskomitee
/ International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966 Dezember 19)
/ Blasphème
/ Liberté d'expression
/ Ordre public
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions XA Droit |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Public Morality
B Pakistan B freedom of expression B Blasphemy B Ireland B Human Rights |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |