We are probably not Sims
In this article, I discuss the current state of the debate around the simulation hypothesis, the idea that the world we inhabit is a computer simulation in or within another universe. Considering recent work from a range of authors, I suggest that statistical arguments in favour of a simulated world...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Paternoster Press
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Science & Christian belief
Année: 2020, Volume: 32, Numéro: 1, Pages: 45-62 |
| RelBib Classification: | CF Christianisme et science NBD Création NBE Anthropologie VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theology
B substrate independence B Argument B Consciousness B Universe B Simulation hypothesis B Information B Spirit B RAZORS B Ockham's Razor B limits of computation B Computer Simulation B Catégorie:Musique soul |
| Résumé: | In this article, I discuss the current state of the debate around the simulation hypothesis, the idea that the world we inhabit is a computer simulation in or within another universe. Considering recent work from a range of authors, I suggest that statistical arguments in favour of a simulated world are naive and fail to account either for Ockham's Razor or for alternative existential possibilities besides base reality and a simulation. Most significantly, I observe that it would be computationally impossible in our own universe to simulate a similar cosmos at fine granularity. This implies substantial differences in size and information content between simulating and simulated universes. I argue that this makes serious analysis of the simulation argument extremely difficult. I suggest that Christian theology has no reason to reinvent itself to accommodate simulism; the two should be viewed as mutually exclusive world-views. Further, I note that the existence of a human soul or spirit, or indeed any non-reductionist explanation of human consciousness, could undermine the assumption of substrate independence that simulism requires. |
|---|---|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Science & Christian belief
|