Justice, Virtue, and Power in Democratic Conflict

The question of how to respond to the deep political divides in the United States today has resulted in the emergence of two camps. On one side are those who argue that the cultivation of civic virtues like civility will lead to more respectful interpersonal relationships through which consensus and...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Kellison, Rosemary B. ca. 21. Jh. (Auteur)
Collaborateurs: Springs, Jason A. (Antécédent bibliographique)
Type de support: Électronique Review
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
Dans: Journal of religious ethics
Année: 2020, Volume: 48, Numéro: 2, Pages: 279-288
Compte rendu de:Healthy conflict in contemporary American society (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2018) (Kellison, Rosemary B.)
RelBib Classification:NCA Éthique
NCD Éthique et politique
ZC Politique en général
Sujets non-standardisés:B Justice
B Compte-rendu de lecture
B Civility
B Democracy
B Civic Virtue
B Empathy
B Relationality
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:The question of how to respond to the deep political divides in the United States today has resulted in the emergence of two camps. On one side are those who argue that the cultivation of civic virtues like civility will lead to more respectful interpersonal relationships through which consensus and mutual understanding can be built. On the other are those who argue that our commitment to justice is primary and may require uncivil behavior to disrupt and change unjust structural relationships. In Healthy Conflict in Contemporary American Society, Jason Springs helps to bridge the divide between these two positions. Because he takes a relational approach that centers both interpersonal and structural relationships, Springs makes both mutual respect and just structures central to his conception of healthy conflict. Taking relationality seriously thus helps to overcome this impasse, but it also raises significant questions about the impact of asymmetrical relationships on citizens’ responsibilities to engage in healthy conflict.
Description:Book discussion
ISSN:1467-9795
Référence:Kritik in "Healthy Conflict in an Era of Intractability (2020)"
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jore.12309