Using Neurosociology and Evolutionary Sociology to Explain the Origin and Evolution of Religions

Religion emerged as a cognitive capacity and behavioral propensity by virtue of Darwinian natural selection on hominins and then humans to become more social and group oriented. The capacity to be religious is only a modest extension of the Darwinian selection on cognitive, emotional, and interperso...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Autres titres:Special Issue on Evolutionary Theories of Religion
Auteur principal: Turner, Jonathan H. 1942- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Equinox Publ. [2016]
Dans: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Année: 2016, Volume: 4, Numéro: 1, Pages: 7-29
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Religion / Développement / Théorie de l'évolution / Sélection naturelle / Neurosciences / Sociologie des religions / Anthropologie de la religion
RelBib Classification:AD Sociologie des religions
AE Psychologie de la religion
Sujets non-standardisés:B Darwinian selection
B Évolution
B Sociology
B Selection
B Religion
B Non-Darwinian selection
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:Religion emerged as a cognitive capacity and behavioral propensity by virtue of Darwinian natural selection on hominins and then humans to become more social and group oriented. The capacity to be religious is only a modest extension of the Darwinian selection on cognitive, emotional, and interpersonal propensities of all great apes and, hence, early hominins. However, other forms of natural selection need to be added to the explanation of why religion became institutionalized in early human societies, why religious organizations arise and die from competition, and why violence is so often a part of religious revolution. These additional types of natural selection do not obviate Darwinian selection on the human brain, but they become a necessary supplement to Darwinian analysis if the early institutionalization and subsequent evolution of religion are to be more fully explained.
ISSN:2049-7563
Référence:Kommentar in "The Trouble with "Evolution of Religion" (2016)"
Kommentar in "Why the Evolutionary Sociology of Religion Should Build on Rather than Reinvent Biological Models (2016)"
Kommentar in "Religion, Neurosociology and Evolutionary Sociology (2016)"
Kommentar in "Turner's Definition and Explanation of Religion (2016)"
Kommentar in "Human Nature and the Sociology of Religion (2016)"
Kommentar in "Explaining Religion(s) with Deep Historical Time Scales (2016)"
Kommentar in "What Is the Relationship of Spencerian, Durkheimian and Marxian Natural Selections to Darwinian Natural Selection and How Can We Formalize Their Mutual Interaction? (2016)"
Kommentar in "Understanding the Evolution of Religion (2016)"
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.35721