De l'exégèse à la polémique: la notion d'akolouthía dans les tomes 1-2 du "Contre Celse" d'Origène

This paper studies the links between exegesis and polemic in Origen, focussing on the exegetical and polemical use of ἀκολουθία in two contemporary works: Commentary on Matthew and Against Celsus. After a short survey of the different meanings of the word ἀκολουθία, we will see how the pagan polemic...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Piscini, Gianluca 1987- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Français
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill [2020]
Dans: Vigiliae Christianae
Année: 2020, Volume: 74, Numéro: 2, Pages: 199-221
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
HC Nouveau Testament
KAB Christianisme primitif
Sujets non-standardisés:B Against Celsus
B Celsus
B Commentary on Matthew
B ἀκολουθία
B True Discourse
B Origen
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This paper studies the links between exegesis and polemic in Origen, focussing on the exegetical and polemical use of ἀκολουθία in two contemporary works: Commentary on Matthew and Against Celsus. After a short survey of the different meanings of the word ἀκολουθία, we will see how the pagan polemicist uses this notion. Then we will study Origen's answer in a more thorough fashion. We will show that, as in the Commentary on Matthew, Origen uses the notion of ἀκολουθία to re-establish the dignity of the Gospels; but he also criticizes the inability of Celsus to correctly understand a text - in other words, his "lack of ἀκολουθία". In the end, it will be clear that in Origen, the notion of ἀκολουθία is crucial both in exegesis and in polemics, and that it helps us to better understand the unity of his thought and of his works.
ISSN:1570-0720
Contient:Enthalten in: Vigiliae Christianae
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700720-12341431