Principles of Fruitful Interreligious Dialogue: A Few Suggestions

The purpose of this article is to draw out principles of fruitful dialogue from the writings of some thinkers who are philosophers, sociologists, or competent in both philosophy and sociology. They are, according to chronology, William James (1842-1910), George Herbert Mead (1863-1931), Alfred Schut...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Roy, Louis (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Peeters [2019]
Dans: Studies in interreligious dialogue
Année: 2019, Volume: 29, Numéro: 2, Pages: 159-183
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B James, William 1842-1910 / Mead, George Herbert 1863-1931 / Schütz, Alfred 1899-1959 / Lonergan, Bernard J. F. 1904-1984 / Apel, Karl-Otto 1922-2017 / Habermas, Jürgen 1929- / Burrell, David B. 1933- / Honneth, Axel 1949- / Vaitkus, Steven 1955- / Cornille, C. 1961- / Dialogue interreligieux
RelBib Classification:AX Dialogue interreligieux
CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:The purpose of this article is to draw out principles of fruitful dialogue from the writings of some thinkers who are philosophers, sociologists, or competent in both philosophy and sociology. They are, according to chronology, William James (1842-1910), George Herbert Mead (1863-1931), Alfred Schutz (1899-1959), Bernard Lonergan (1904-1984), Karl-Otto Apel (1922-2017), Jürgen Habermas (1929-), David Burrell (1933-), Axel Honneth (1949-), Steven Vaitkus (1955-), and Catherine Cornille (1961-). My treatment of those authors will be very selective because it will be commanded by my central goal: to bring into view facts of human interaction and rules of interpersonal communication.
ISSN:1783-1806
Contient:Enthalten in: Studies in interreligious dialogue
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/SID.29.2.3287305