The Presidential Self - Pardon Paradox

The clemency power of the U.S. President is limited to pardoning federal offences and expressly excludes federal impeachment from the pardon power. There is no explicit prohibition upon who might be the recipient of a presidential pardon. The U.S. Constitution does not expressly prohibit the Preside...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perry, Clifton (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Institute for Interdisciplinary Research [2019]
In: Journal of interdisciplinary studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 31, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 123-142
RelBib Classification:KBQ North America
NCD Political ethics
ZC Politics in general
Further subjects:B IMPEACHMENT of presidents
B Clemency
B PRESIDENTS of the United States
B UNITED States. Constitution
B EXECUTIVE power; United States

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1693350408
003 DE-627
005 20200630161651.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200326s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1693350408 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1693350408 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)170484009  |0 (DE-627)060580674  |0 (DE-576)131367706  |4 aut  |a Perry, Clifton 
109 |a Perry, Clifton 
245 1 4 |a The Presidential Self - Pardon Paradox 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The clemency power of the U.S. President is limited to pardoning federal offences and expressly excludes federal impeachment from the pardon power. There is no explicit prohibition upon who might be the recipient of a presidential pardon. The U.S. Constitution does not expressly prohibit the President from issuing a self-pardon. If the American Framers placed only the one exception for impeachment, then arguably they meant to exclude all other conceivable exceptions. Yet, the very notion of such presidential self-forgiveness raises arguments criticizing the possibility. Would not a selfpardon place the President above the law? In the process of investigating the various arguments denying and supporting the possibility, the parameters and the goals of issuing and accepting or rejecting a presidential pardon are developed along with alternative methods of achieving the same result as a self-pardon without actually issuing a self-pardon. Hence, the puzzle. The essay's narrow and guarded conclusions are arrived at defeasibly. That is, the essay is driven by the force of the arguments over this paradoxical constitutional dilemma. The essay is intended as the beginning rather than a completion of the inquiry. 
650 4 |a Clemency 
650 4 |a EXECUTIVE power; United States 
650 4 |a IMPEACHMENT of presidents 
650 4 |a PRESIDENTS of the United States 
650 4 |a UNITED States. Constitution 
652 |a KBQ:NCD:ZC 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of interdisciplinary studies  |d Santa Monica, Calif. : Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, 1989  |g 31(2019), 1/2, Seite 123-142  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341360872  |w (DE-600)2068817-9  |w (DE-576)456301429  |x 2766-0508  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2019  |g number:1/2  |g pages:123-142 
936 u w |d 31  |j 2019  |e 1/2  |h 123-142 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3613885409 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1693350408 
LOK |0 005 20200630161651 
LOK |0 008 200326||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442049227  |a KBQ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736965  |a ZC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052856  |a NCD 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL