What Evicting Grizzly Bear Spirit Does (and Doesn't) Tell Us about Indigenous "Religion" and Indigenous Rights
The Canadian Supreme Court's (2017) decision in Ktunaxa First Nation v. British Columbia is instructive because it demonstrates the continuing incompatibility of what religion "means" in the Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities, respectively. There are, however, additional lesson...
| Published in: | Studies in religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| In: |
Studies in religion
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Canada, Supreme Court
/ Kutenai
/ Religion
/ British Columbia
/ Religious freedom
/ Minority rights
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy BB Indigenous religions KBQ North America XA Law |
| Further subjects: | B
Indigenous Religion
B Ktunaxa B modèles de religions B Canadian Supreme Court B religion autochtone B Indigenous rights B droits des autochtones B Cour suprême du Canada B models of religion |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |