Shame, Sin, Mental Illness, and a Feminist Theology of Agency

Traditional theology demonstrates pervasive failure not only to distinguish shame from guilt but also to distinguish sin from illness. A profoundly harmful effect of these entanglements is shaming those who live with mental illness. A feminist theology of agency as relational uncovers and counters t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Downie, Alison (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis [2020]
In: Journal of disability & religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 24, Issue: 1, Pages: 29-39
Further subjects:B Agency
B relational theology
B Mental Illness
B Shame
B Sin
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1690195657
003 DE-627
005 20200217171709.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200217s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/23312521.2019.1694461  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1690195657 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1690195657 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)107750585X  |0 (DE-627)837151600  |0 (DE-576)446316253  |4 aut  |a Downie, Alison 
109 |a Downie, Alison 
245 1 0 |a Shame, Sin, Mental Illness, and a Feminist Theology of Agency 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Traditional theology demonstrates pervasive failure not only to distinguish shame from guilt but also to distinguish sin from illness. A profoundly harmful effect of these entanglements is shaming those who live with mental illness. A feminist theology of agency as relational uncovers and counters these harmful entanglements. 
601 |a Feminist 
601 |a Theologe 
650 4 |a Agency 
650 4 |a Mental Illness 
650 4 |a relational theology 
650 4 |a Shame 
650 4 |a Sin 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of disability & religion  |d Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 2014  |g 24(2020), 1, Seite 29-39  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)790615509  |w (DE-600)2777009-6  |w (DE-576)40970038X  |x 2331-253X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:29-39 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2019.1694461  |x Resolving-System 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2020  |e 1  |h 29-39 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3596177596 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1690195657 
LOK |0 005 20200217172033 
LOK |0 008 200217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL