The Ethics of Doing Comparative Hagiology

This paper argues that a virtue-informed methodology is foundational to best practice in scholarly, collaborative, and comparative hagiological work. Following a discussion of how this resonates with Todd French's work in this volume, I then draw from my experience as an educator to outline how...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Harrower, Scott D. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: MDPI [2019]
Dans: Religions
Année: 2019, Volume: 10, Numéro: 12
Sujets non-standardisés:B Justice
B Ethics
B Pedagogy
B hagiology
B Religious Studies
B disciplinary innovation
B Comparative Method
B collaborative scholarship
B Hagiography
B Comparative Religions
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This paper argues that a virtue-informed methodology is foundational to best practice in scholarly, collaborative, and comparative hagiological work. Following a discussion of how this resonates with Todd French's work in this volume, I then draw from my experience as an educator to outline how a virtue-based approach might play out in pedagogy. Finally, I offer two metaphors for an "other-person centered" collaborative-comparativist mindset. Both of these are taken from my lived, and conversational "apprenticeship" in comparative hagiology on the Argentine-Brazilian border. Reflection on these metaphors, as well as their generative experiences, demonstrates the need for holistic self-reflection in the comparative study of religions, and of "hagiography" in particular.
ISSN:2077-1444
Contient:Enthalten in: Religions
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.3390/rel10120660