Modest reflections on the ambiguous future of the study of religion(s)
Reflection on the future study of religion(s) poses three questions: What is the definition of religion? What should study' mean in the academic discourse about religion? And how about its future as an independent discipline within the humanities? The first question brings about a critique of...
| Subtitles: | Futures |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
[2020]
|
| In: |
Religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 50, Issue: 1, Pages: 83-89 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Science of Religion
/ Religion
/ Definition
/ Method
/ Ambiguity
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion |
| Further subjects: | B
Definition
B Identity B 4IR B The study of religion(s) |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1687991138 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409134430.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200121s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/0048721X.2019.1681104 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1687991138 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1687991138 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1147197733 |0 (DE-627)1005999759 |0 (DE-576)421133279 |4 aut |a Kim, Chae Young | |
| 109 | |a Kim, Chae Young |a Kim, Chae Y. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Modest reflections on the ambiguous future of the study of religion(s) |c Chae Young Kim |
| 246 | 1 | |i Rubrikentitel |a Futures | |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Reflection on the future study of religion(s) poses three questions: What is the definition of religion? What should study' mean in the academic discourse about religion? And how about its future as an independent discipline within the humanities? The first question brings about a critique of the conceptual definition of religion and the true purpose of the study of religion(s) in wholistic human formation. The second suggests a departure from the monotone of a European and North American model of study.' And the third encourages self-conscious and tolerance of the ambiguous and ambivalent identity of the study and moving towards more active engagements in the era of the 4IR. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a 4IR | |
| 650 | 4 | |a The study of religion(s) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Definition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Identity | |
| 652 | |a AA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049426-3 |0 (DE-627)106187058 |0 (DE-576)209082003 |2 gnd |a Religionswissenschaft |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049396-9 |0 (DE-627)106187155 |0 (DE-576)209081880 |2 gnd |a Religion |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4148989-5 |0 (DE-627)10556463X |0 (DE-576)209769009 |2 gnd |a Definition |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4038971-6 |0 (DE-627)106230158 |0 (DE-576)209032642 |2 gnd |a Methode |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4138525-1 |0 (DE-627)105642010 |0 (DE-576)209686782 |2 gnd |a Ambiguität |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religion |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, 1971 |g 50(2020), 1, Seite 83-89 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)268128154 |w (DE-600)1471703-7 |w (DE-576)104344660 |x 1096-1151 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:50 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:83-89 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2019.1681104 |x Resolving-System |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3577922389 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1687991138 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200526182353 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200121||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042966 |a AA | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Ambiguity,Definition,Method,Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion,Science of Religion,Religious studies,Religionswissenschaft,Religions |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Ambigüité,Définition,Méthode,Religion,Religions,Religion,Science des religions |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Ambigüedad,Ciencias de la religión,Definición,Método,Religión,Religión,Religión |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Ambiguità,Definizione,Metodo,Religione,Religione,Religione,Scienze religiose |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,宗教学,定义,界说,方法,办法,歧义,无棱两可 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,宗教學,定義,界說,方法,辦法,歧義,無稜兩可 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ambiguidade,Ciências da religião,Definição,Método,Religião,Religião |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Метод,Неоднозначность,Определение,Религиоведение,Религия,Религия (мотив) |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ασάφεια,Αμφισημία,Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκειολογία,Μέθοδος,Ορισμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Begriffsbestimmung,Begriffserklärung,Begriffsanalyse |
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Religious studies,Religionsphilosophie,Scholasticism,Scholastik,Theologie,Theology,Religionsforschung , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Begriffsbestimmung,Begriffserklärung,Begriffsanalyse , Methodik,Verfahren,Technik,Methoden , Mehrdeutigkeit,Zweideutigkeit,Uneindeutigkeit |