Nature and Modernity: Can One Philosophize about Nature Today?
A conspicuous feature of modernity has been the rejection of nature as an authoritative ground of intelligibility and value, a position once defended by nearly all Catholic philosophers. Since Fr. Ernan McMullin's 1969 article, "Philosophies of Nature," however, the philosophy of natu...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[2017]
|
| In: |
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Year: 2017, Volume: 91, Pages: 51-62 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCG Environmental ethics; Creation ethics VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Nature
B Philosophers B philosophy of science B Modernity B Philosophy of nature B Affirmations B Nagel, Thomas, 1937- |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1687950121 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409125821.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200121s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/acpaproc2019102193 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1687950121 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1687950121 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1147189021 |0 (DE-627)1008547018 |0 (DE-576)421122552 |4 aut |a Blum, Christopher Olaf |d 1969- | |
| 109 | |a Blum, Christopher Olaf 1969- |a Blum, Christopher 1969- |a Blum, Christopher O. 1969- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Nature and Modernity |b Can One Philosophize about Nature Today? |c Christopher O. Blum |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A conspicuous feature of modernity has been the rejection of nature as an authoritative ground of intelligibility and value, a position once defended by nearly all Catholic philosophers. Since Fr. Ernan McMullin's 1969 article, "Philosophies of Nature," however, the philosophy of nature has been eclipsed by the philosophy of science in mainstream Catholic philosophy. After examining McMullin's reasons for setting aside the philosophy of nature and Thomas Nagel's recent re-affirmation of the possibility of a philosophical reflection upon nature prior to the claims of empirical science, this article responds to McMullin's critique and defends the viability of an Aristotelian understanding of nature today. | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Affirmations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Modernity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nagel, Thomas, 1937- | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nature | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy of nature | |
| 650 | 4 | |a philosophy of science | |
| 652 | |a NCG:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a American Catholic Philosophical Association |t Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |d Washington, DC, 1926 |g 91(2017), Seite 51-62 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)376274395 |w (DE-600)2130243-1 |w (DE-576)443083517 |x 2153-7925 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:91 |g year:2017 |g pages:51-62 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc2019102193 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3577820144 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1687950121 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200311092228 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200121||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052988 |a NCG | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||