Divine authority and the virtue of religion: a Thomistic response to Murphy

In his book, An Essay on Divine Authority, Mark Murphy argues that God does not have practical authority over created, rational agents. Although Murphy mentions the possibility of an argument for divine authority from justice, he does not consider any. In this paper, I develop such an argument from...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Dahm, Brandon (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Springer Nature B. V [2019]
Dans: International journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 86, Numéro: 3, Pages: 213-226
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274 / Dieu / Autorité / Éthique chrétienne / Murphy, Mark C. 1968-
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
NBC Dieu
Sujets non-standardisés:B Justice
B philosophy of religion
B Aquinas
B Practical authority
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:In his book, An Essay on Divine Authority, Mark Murphy argues that God does not have practical authority over created, rational agents. Although Murphy mentions the possibility of an argument for divine authority from justice, he does not consider any. In this paper, I develop such an argument from Aquinas's treatment of the virtue of religion and other parts of justice. The divine excellence is due honor, and, as Aquinas argues, honoring a ruler requires service and obedience. Thus, a classical conception of God coupled with some of Aquinas's theses concerning justice show that God has practical authority over all created, rational agents.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contient:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-019-09710-5