Transformational Post-Secularism: An Overlooked Strand of Thought

This article identifies an overlooked strand of post-secular thought, which I call "transformational." Transformational post-secularism differs from other prominent post-secularisms by envisioning the emergence of a new socio-spiritual order that transcends modern secularism without abando...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Schewel, Benjamin (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Oxford University Press [2019]
Dans: Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 87, Numéro: 4, Pages: 1085-1112
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Furani, Khaled 1973- / Mahmood, Saba 1962-2018 / Postsécularisme / Transformation (motif) / Discours / Histoire intellectuelle 1950-2000
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This article identifies an overlooked strand of post-secular thought, which I call "transformational." Transformational post-secularism differs from other prominent post-secularisms by envisioning the emergence of a new socio-spiritual order that transcends modern secularism without abandoning its commitment to diversity. This article clarifies the main features of transformational post-secularism and identifies the historical context in which it arose. As part of this analysis, I argue that, contrary to Khaled Furani's claim that post-secular discourse arose in the late 1990s, it actually began in the 1950s as part of a wider "crisis of man" debate. I also suggest that the axial age discourse, which crystallized at the same time and has gained significant influence in recent years, constitutes a main arena in which transformational post-secular thinking has, over the last seven decades, evolved. I conclude by considering the plausibility and potential applications of the idea of transformational post-secularism, which includes responding to Mahmood's and Furani's suggestion that scholars drop the term "post-secular" from their lexicon.
ISSN:1477-4585
Contient:Enthalten in: American Academy of Religion, Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfz066