Religion, law and politics: The "trickle-down" effects of ECtHR judgments on Turkey's headscarf battles
Building on and extending Marc Galanter’s classic thesis on the “radiating effects” of courts, this paper proposes the concept of “trickle-down effects” in order to account for the complex ways in which court judgments may impact political processes, often taking place through the ideological manipu...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill, Nijhoff
2019
|
| Dans: |
Religion and human rights
Année: 2019, Volume: 14, Numéro: 3, Pages: 135-168 |
| RelBib Classification: | BJ Islam KBL Proche-Orient et Afrique du Nord XA Droit |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
European Court of Human Rights
B Justice and Development Party (AKP) B radiating effects B populism and religious identity B trickle-down effects B Headscarf |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | Building on and extending Marc Galanter’s classic thesis on the “radiating effects” of courts, this paper proposes the concept of “trickle-down effects” in order to account for the complex ways in which court judgments may impact political processes, often taking place through the ideological manipulation of the judgments and leading to unintended and unforeseen consequences. The paper specifically examines the headscarf battles in Turkey and the pivotal role that the ECtHR judgments played in it. While the short-term legal impact was the confirmation of the ban on the use of headscarves, presumably supporting the principle of secularism, the long-term impact has been the exact opposite. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-0328 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religion and human rights
|