Climacus' Miracle: Another Look at "the Wonder" in Philosophical Fragments through a Spinozist Lens

In Chapter 2 of the Philosophical Fragments, Søren Kierkegaard's pseudonym Johannes Climacus poetises about a "king who loved a maiden." Climacus concludes this venture with a bold claim: what he has just described is "so different from any human poem" that it should not be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Nebentitel:Section 1: Problems and Perspectives in Kierkegaard’s Authorship
1. VerfasserIn: Marcar, G.P. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: De Gruyter [2019]
In: Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
Jahr: 2019, Band: 24, Heft: 1, Seiten: 59-84
RelBib Classification:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
KAH Kirchengeschichte 1648-1913; Neuzeit
NBC Gotteslehre
VA Philosophie
Online Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In Chapter 2 of the Philosophical Fragments, Søren Kierkegaard's pseudonym Johannes Climacus poetises about a "king who loved a maiden." Climacus concludes this venture with a bold claim: what he has just described is "so different from any human poem" that it should not be regarded as a poem at all, but as "the wonder" [Vidunderet] which leads one to exclaim in adoration that "[t]his thought did not arise in my own heart!" In the subsequent chapter of Philosophical Fragments, Climacus proceeds to offer a number of arguments against demonstrations of God's existence, leading many scholars to conclude that he represents an unequivocally anti-rationalist perspective. Against such interpretations, this paper will seek to highlight how Climacus' claims track those of the seventeenth century Dutch lens-grinder and rationalist philosopher, Baruch Spinoza. From this, it will be argued that "the wonder" in Climacus' thought takes the form of an indirect, ethico-existentialist argument for the truth of Christianity's incarnate God.
ISSN:1612-9792
Enthält:Enthalten in: Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2019-0003