Deity Representation: A Prototype Approach

This research systematically evaluates via prototype analysis how conceptualizations of Western adult's monotheistic God are structured. Over 4 studies, using U.S. student and community samples of predominantly Christians, features of God are identified, feature centrality is documented, and ce...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: May, Ross W. (Auteur) ; Fincham, Frank D. 1954- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: SAGE Publishing [2018]
Dans: Archive for the psychology of religion
Année: 2018, Volume: 40, Numéro: 2/3, Pages: 258-286
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Monothéisme / Image de Dieu
RelBib Classification:NBC Dieu
Sujets non-standardisés:B Deity
B features
B Cognition
B Representation
B prototype
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This research systematically evaluates via prototype analysis how conceptualizations of Western adult's monotheistic God are structured. Over 4 studies, using U.S. student and community samples of predominantly Christians, features of God are identified, feature centrality is documented, and centrality influence on cognition is evaluated. Studies 1 and 2 produced considerable overlap in feature frequency and centrality ratings across the samples, with "God is love" being the most frequently listed central feature. In Studies 3 (choice latency) and 4 (recall and recognition memory), the centrality of features influenced cognitive processes: central features were more quickly identified as features of God than peripheral features; were correctly recognized more often; and central features were correctly recalled more often than peripheral features. Results indicated that participants meaningfully judged centrality and that centrality affected cognition. Thus, the two criteria necessary for demonstrating deity representations adhere to a prototype structure were met. Implications and future directions are discussed.
ISSN:1573-6121
Contient:Enthalten in: Archive for the psychology of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15736121-12341361